Skip to main content

Oade v. State

Citations

  • 960 P.2d 336
  • 114 Nev. 619
  • 1998 Nev. LEXIS 75
  • 1998 WL 275613

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, viewed in the entirety, the district court remarks to defense counsel may have had a prejudicial impact on the verdict
  • concluding that, viewed in the entirety, the district court remarks to defense counsel may have had a prejudicial impact on the verdict
  • holding that \[a] trial judge has a responsibility to maintain order and decorum in trial proceedings\ and allegations of \[j]udicial misconduct must be preserved for appellate review\
  • holding that “[a] trial judge has a responsibility to maintain order and decorum in trial proceedings” and allegations of “[¡Judicial misconduct must be preserved for appellate review”
  • concluding that remand was appropriate where the district court's admonishments collectively prejudiced the appellant's case
  • concluding that remand was appropriate where the district court's admonishments collectively prejudiced the appellant's case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Springer, Gibbons, Shearing, Maupin, Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.