Skip to main content

Quillen v. State

Citations

  • 929 P.2d 893
  • 112 Nev. 1369
  • 1996 Nev. LEXIS 172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that repeated references to holiday on which murders occurred were appeals to jurors emotions
  • stating that the district court’s decision was “not clearly erroneous” without articulating a standard of review
  • noting that so-called “holiday” arguments are inappropriate but rarely warrant reversal by themselves
  • warning that analogizing reasonable doubt to the most important decisions in life, like choosing a spouse or buying a house, is improper because such decisions are wholly unlike the one jurors must make in a criminal case
  • stating in dicta that decisions on whether to give or decline proposed jury instructions reviewed for abuse of discretion
  • finding the State’s efforts reasonable when it made an effort to contact the witnesses, and it was “revealed that the witnesses quit their 26 jobs, moved out of their home some five months prior to trial, [ ] left no forwarding address ... [and potentially] returned to Mexico”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.