Skip to main content

Wesley v. State

Citations

  • 916 P.2d 793
  • 112 Nev. 503
  • 1996 Nev. LEXIS 78

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that defendant is not entitled to relief from limitation of voir dire if impaneled jury is impartial
  • concluding that defendant is not entitled to relief from limitation of voir dire if impaneled jury is impartial
  • concluding that a defendant cannot show prejudice if the impaneled jury is impartial
  • concluding that a defendant cannot show prejudice if the impaneled jury is impartial
  • concluding that a defendant cannot show prejudice if the impaneled jury is impartial
  • holding that a claim of prejudice based on a wasted peremptory challenge must focus on whether the impaneled jury was impartial and that, if the impaneled jury is impartial, the defendant has not been prejudiced

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.