Ninth Circuit· 6/27/2003
Ramirez v. Galaza
Citations
- 334 F.3d 850
- 2003 Daily Journal DAR 7144
- 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5662
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 13034
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a due process challenge to a prison disciplinary hearing which did not 7 result in the loss of good-time credits was cognizable under § 1983
- no liberty interest in processing 5 of appeals because no entitlement to a specific grievance procedure
- no liberty interest in 4 processing of appeals because no entitlement to a specific grievance procedure
- “[I]nmates lack a separate 24 constitutional entitlement to a specific prison grievance procedure.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
70 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerNinth Circuit· 2014-11-18· cited 6,202×
- Cion Peralta v. T. DillardNinth Circuit· 2014-03-06· cited 1,019×
- Lira v. HerreraNinth Circuit· 2005-10-31· cited 720×
- Silva v. Di VittorioNinth Circuit· 2011-09-26· cited 504×
- Rex Chappell v. R. MandevilleNinth Circuit· 2013-01-31· cited 163×
- Lumumba Incumaa v. Bryan StirlingFourth Circuit· 2015-07-01· cited 143×
- Brown v. Oregon Department of CorrectionsNinth Circuit· 2014-04-29· cited 112×
- McQuillion v. SchwarzeneggerNinth Circuit· 2004-05-19· cited 103×
- Byrd v. Maricopa County Board of SupervisorsNinth Circuit· 2017-01-06· cited 87×
- Simpson v. ThomasNinth Circuit· 2008-06-11· cited 56×
- Robert Griffin v. James GomezNinth Circuit· 2014-01-28· cited 41×
- De Witt Long v. SugaiNinth Circuit· 2024-02-05· cited 30×
- Hernandez v. CateC.D. California· 2013-01-18· cited 26×
- Todd Ashker v. Gavin NewsomNinth Circuit· 2023-08-24· cited 20×
- Cox v. ClarkNinth Circuit· 2009-04-08· cited 12×
- Velez v. Cloghan Concepts, LLCS.D. California· 2019-06-10· cited 7×
- Henderson v. MunizN.D. California· 2016-07-20· cited 6×
- William Thornton v. Arnold SchwarzeneggarNinth Circuit· 2013-07-31· cited 5×
- Larkin v. WattsNinth Circuit· 2008-11-12· cited 5×
- Velarde v. DuarteS.D. California· 2013-03-19· cited 4×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 15,294×
- Lopez v. SmithNinth Circuit· 2000-02-10· cited 9,722×
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1973-05-07· cited 9,100×
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court· 1995-06-19· cited 9,097×
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court· 1998-03-03· cited 3,515×
- Edwards v. BalisokSupreme Court· 1997-05-19· cited 2,485×
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 2,261×
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 1,854×
- Herman Resnick v. Warden Hayes Lt. Ernst Officer Myers (Dho) Counselor Aune Officer WadeNinth Circuit· 2000-05-22· cited 1,510×
- Ramirez v. GalazaNinth Circuit· 2003-06-27· cited 1,060×
- Anthony Dewalt v. Lamark Carter, Correctional Officer Young, Carol BiesterSeventh Circuit· 2000-08-11· cited 1,001×
- Charles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesNinth Circuit· 1996-05-08· cited 978×
- David Allen Mann v. James Adams, and Bruce Babbitt, Governor of ArizonaNinth Circuit· 1988-10-11· cited 745×
- Cooper v. PickettNinth Circuit· 1997-08-08· cited 477×
- Neal v. ShimodaNinth Circuit· 1997-12-11· cited 379×
- Leamer v. FauverThird Circuit· 2002-04-19· cited 361×
- Cabrera v. City of Huntington ParkNinth Circuit· 1998-10-16· cited 317×
- Eric Jenkins v. Lt. HaubertSecond Circuit· 1999-06-11· cited 250×
- Leeroy B. Bostic, Jr. v. Peter Carlson, WardenNinth Circuit· 1989-09-07· cited 206×
- Narvis G. Nonnette v. Larry Small R. Schelke E. Castro D. Johnson M.A. Corbin J. BuiltmanNinth Circuit· 2002-12-26· cited 194×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.