Todd Ashker v. Gavin Newsom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the parties’ agreement that “the proper baseline when deciding whether a challenged condition is atypical and significant is fact-specific and varies from case to case”
• “Among other requirements, Wolff requires 27 that an inmate facing a disciplinary hearing be provided written notice of the charges and the ability 28 to call witnesses and present documentary evidence in his defense.”
• “Among other requirements, Wolff requires 25 that an inmate facing a disciplinary hearing be provided written notice of the charges and 26 the ability to call witnesses and present documentary evidence in his defense.”
• “In 27 California, contract law applies to settlement agreements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Todd Ashker v. Gavin Newsom

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Todd Ashker v. Gavin Newsom
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-08-03· cited 7×
• Todd Ashker v. Gavin Newsom
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-08-03· cited 4×