Ninth Circuit· 1/31/2013

Rex Chappell v. R. Mandeville

Citations

706 F.3d 1052
2013 WL 364203
2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 2192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that it was not clearly established in 2002 that forcing a prisoner to sleep \without a mattress” but with \a bed and a blanket” violated the Eighth Amendment
holding that a California prisoner placed on contraband watch for six 18 days could not claim a liberty interest under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth 19 Amendment
finding officials entitled to qualified immunity for Eighth Amendment lighting claim by prisoner on contraband watch who did not claim sleep deprivation
finding it was not clearly established “that constant illumination violates the Eighth Amendment when done for a legitimate penological purpose”
finding it was not 5 - OPINION AND ORDER clearly established “that constant illumination violates the Eighth Amendment when done for a legitimate penological purpose”
granting qualified immunity where there was a legitimate penological purpose for constant illumination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berzon, Bybee, Graham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

68 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.