District of Columbia· 9/3/2015
Queen v. Schmidt
Judges: Judge Paul L. Friedman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court· 2014-01-14· cited 4,713×
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court· 2011-06-27· cited 4,319×
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,478×
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1999-05-17· cited 3,295×
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court· 2007-03-05· cited 1,961×
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2004-01-30· cited 1,014×
- Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court· 2006-05-01· cited 695×
- Mwani, Odilla Mutaka v. Bin Ladin, UsamaD.C. Circuit· 2005-08-05· cited 552×
- First Chicago International v. United Exchange Co., Ltd.First Circuit· 1988-01-19· cited 397×
- Kent B. Crane v. New York Zoological SocietyD.C. Circuit· 1990-01-30· cited 384×
- Prempro Products Liability Litigation v. WyethEighth Circuit· 2010-01-06· cited 335×
- Price v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab JamahiriyaD.C. Circuit· 2002-06-28· cited 329×
- Mark F. Elmore v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster GeneralSeventh Circuit· 2000-09-14· cited 328×
- In Re Interbank Funding Corp. SEC. LitigationD.C. Circuit· 2010-12-28· cited 218×
- Billie Davenport v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Afl-CioD.C. Circuit· 1999-02-02· cited 196×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.