Billie Davenport v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Afl-Cio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \[c]ases describing the scope of the duty freely cite precedents under both statutes\
• stating that Rule 19 does not create a cause of action
• declining, given the facts of the case, to decide if Winter created a “stricter standard” to obtain interim injunctive relief
• fact that rule change eliminated flight attendants’ per diem pay and hotel allowances did not constitute irreparable injury, because it could be remedied with money damages
• “[W]hile [Federal] Rule 19 provides for joinder of necessary parties, it does not create a cause of action against them.”
• “[T]he temporary loss of income, ultimately to be recovered, does not usually constitute irreparable injury.” (quoting Sampson v. Murray, 415 U.S. 61, 90 (1974) (alteration in original))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).