Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. Brown

Oral argument

• Argued

  61 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that sales of the defendant’s tires in the forum state through intermediaries “fell far short” of constituting continuous and systematics contacts
• holding that “[f]or an individual, the paradigm forum for the exercise of general 26 jurisdiction is the individual’s domicile”
• holding that “[f]or an individual, the paradigm forum for the exercise of general 26 jurisdiction is the individual’s domicile”
• holding that the paradigmatic forum for corporate defendants is where the corporation is “fairly regarded as at home”
• holding that a corporation’s place of incorporation and principal place of business are bases for general jurisdiction
• holding that a “paradigm forum for the exercise of general jurisdiction” for a corporation is one in which the corporation is fairly regarded as at home

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).