Skip to main content
· 3/5/2007

Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.

Citations

  • 549 U.S. 422
  • 127 S. Ct. 1184
  • 167 L. Ed. 2d 15
  • 2007 U.S. LEXIS 2828
  • 2007 A.M.C. 609
  • 75 U.S.L.W. 4126
  • 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, per Sinochem, the district court was not required to first establish jurisdiction before dismissing the case on estoppel grounds
  • recognizing that a court may dismiss a case on forum non conveniens grounds before addressing jurisdiction
  • holding that a district court may address a forum non conveniens plea before considering personal jurisdiction or subject matter jurisdiction
  • holding that a federal court may dismiss an action on the basis of a threshold, nonmerits issue without first definitively determining whether it has jurisdiction over the case
  • holding that a defendant invoking forum non conveniens \bears a heavy burden in opposing the plaintiff's chosen forum\
  • holding that a defendant invoking forum non conveniens “bears a heavy burden in opposing the plaintiffs chosen forum”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.