· 3/5/2007
Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.
Citations
- 549 U.S. 422
- 127 S. Ct. 1184
- 167 L. Ed. 2d 15
- 2007 U.S. LEXIS 2828
- 2007 A.M.C. 609
- 75 U.S.L.W. 4126
- 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 104
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, per Sinochem, the district court was not required to first establish jurisdiction before dismissing the case on estoppel grounds
- recognizing that a court may dismiss a case on forum non conveniens grounds before addressing jurisdiction
- holding that a district court may address a forum non conveniens plea before considering personal jurisdiction or subject matter jurisdiction
- holding that a federal court may dismiss an action on the basis of a threshold, nonmerits issue without first definitively determining whether it has jurisdiction over the case
- holding that a defendant invoking forum non conveniens \bears a heavy burden in opposing the plaintiff's chosen forum\
- holding that a defendant invoking forum non conveniens “bears a heavy burden in opposing the plaintiffs chosen forum”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.