· 8/5/2005
Mwani, Odilla Mutaka v. Bin Ladin, Usama
Citations
- 417 F.3d 1
- 368 U.S. App. D.C. 1
- 62 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 632
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16185
- 2005 WL 1844423
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plaintiffs “may rest their [jurisdictional] argument on their pleadings, bolstered by such affidavits and other written materials as they can otherwise obtain”
- holding that jurisdiction could be exercised where defendants had engaged in numerous conspiracies to bomb the World Trade Center, the United Nations, and the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels
- holding that plaintiffs “may rest their [jurisdictional] argument on their pleadings, bolstered by such affidavits and other written materials as they can otherwise obtain”
- holding that jurisdiction could be exercised where 21 defendants had engaged in numerous conspiracies to bomb locations in the United States
- holding that plaintiffs “may rest their [jurisdictional] argument on their pleadings, bolstered by such affidavits and other written materials as they can otherwise obtain”
- holding that jurisdiction could be exercised where defendants had engaged in numerous conspiracies to bomb the World Trade Center, the United Nations, and the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edwards, Tatel, Garland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.