Skip to main content
· 8/5/2005

Mwani, Odilla Mutaka v. Bin Ladin, Usama

Citations

  • 417 F.3d 1
  • 368 U.S. App. D.C. 1
  • 62 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 632
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16185
  • 2005 WL 1844423

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiffs “may rest their [jurisdictional] argument on their pleadings, bolstered by such affidavits and other written materials as they can otherwise obtain”
  • holding that jurisdiction could be exercised where defendants had engaged in numerous conspiracies to bomb the World Trade Center, the United Nations, and the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels
  • holding that plaintiffs “may rest their [jurisdictional] argument on their pleadings, bolstered by such affidavits and other written materials as they can otherwise obtain”
  • holding that jurisdiction could be exercised where 21 defendants had engaged in numerous conspiracies to bomb locations in the United States
  • holding that plaintiffs “may rest their [jurisdictional] argument on their pleadings, bolstered by such affidavits and other written materials as they can otherwise obtain”
  • holding that jurisdiction could be exercised where defendants had engaged in numerous conspiracies to bomb the World Trade Center, the United Nations, and the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Tatel, Garland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.