Skip to main content

Heard v. State

Citations

  • 844 S.E.2d 791
  • 309 Ga. 76

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that although the evidence that the appellant participated in the crimes for which he was convicted was “not strong,” it was constitutionally sufficient
  • concluding that prejudicial effect of other-acts evidence was “substantial” because of the egregious means by which the earlier crime was committed
  • concluding that “[t]here was no reason to believe” that the defendant committed the respective offenses considering the “the major differences between them”
  • explaining that the trial court’s instruction that the jury could consider the inadmissible evidence for a number of improper purposes increased the harm of the evidence
  • noting that stealing a vehicle and then burning and abandoning that vehicle were not distinctive enough features to satisfy the common-scheme analysis
  • noting that the evidence that Appellant committed the charged crimes was “shaky”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.