Skip to main content

Harris v. State

Citations

  • 321 Ga. 87

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the erroneous admission of “powerful and highly prejudicial” other-acts evidence was not harmless, in part because the State emphasized that the evidence showed the appellant’s criminal propensity
  • referring to closing argument when evaluating whether improperly admitted evidence was harmful
  • “[I]f the wrongly admitted evidence . . . was important to proving an element of the State’s case—only the most compelling properly admitted evidence of guilt might prevent reversal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.