Seventh Circuit· 7/21/2016

Poullard v. McDonald

Citations

829 F.3d 844
2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13327
100 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,604
129 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 605
2016 WL 3924375

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that unfulfilled threats are not materially adverse actions for the purpose of a Title VII retaliation claim
holding that an employer's unfulfilled threats of unspecified disciplinary action did not constitute adverse actions
holding that “three arguably race- tinged remarks did not rise to the level of severe or pervasive conduct” to survive summary judgment
recognizing that unfulfilled threats are not ma‐ terially adverse actions for the purpose of a Title VII retalia‐ tion claim
holding that a threat of future harm, without actual economic harm is not an adverse employment action
concluding that the plaintiff failed to explain what harmful effects flowed from the admonishment letter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hamilton, Manion, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.