Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 2/18/1997

Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.

Citations

  • 519 U.S. 337
  • 117 S. Ct. 843
  • 136 L. Ed. 2d 808
  • 1997 U.S. LEXIS 690

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that courts generally read statutory language in the context of the broader statutory scheme
  • stating that the plainness or ambiguity of statutory language is determined by reference to the language itself and the context in which the language is used
  • holding former employee could bring claim under § 2000e-3(a) alleging that former employer gave out a negative employment reference in retaliation for his having filed an EEOC charge
  • stating .that statutory interpretation focuses on “the language itself, the specific context in which that language is used, and the broader context of the statute as a whole”
  • looking to “the language itself, the specific context in which the language is used, and the broader context of the statute as a whole”
  • resolving the meaning of a statutory term by considering “[t]he broader context provided by other sections of the statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,832 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.