Kim Patterson v. Avery Dennison Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \we cannot compare [an employer's] treatment of [a plaintiff] and [a co-worker]\ if the plaintiff \fail[s] to meet her burden of establishing that [the co-worker] is a similarly situated employee\
• holding that “we cannot compare [an employer’s] treatment of [a plaintiff with that co-worker] ... [if the plaintiff] fail[s] to meet her burden of establishing that [the co-worker] is a similarly situated employee.”
• holding that an employee who worked in a managerial position was not a similarly situated comparator to subordinate employee plaintiff
• holding that “we cannot compare [an employer’s] treatment of [a plaintiff] and [a co-worker]” if the plaintiff “fail[s] to meet her burden of establishing that [the co-worker] is a similarly situated employee”
• holding that “we cannot compare [an em‐ ployer’s] treatment of [a plaintiff] and [a co‐worker]” if the plaintiff “fail[s] to meet her burden of establishing that [the co‐worker] is a similarly situated employee”
• holding that \we cannot compare [an employer’s] treatment of [a plaintiff with that co-worker] . . . [if the plaintiff] fail[s] to meet her burden of establishing that [the co-worker] is a similarly situated employee.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).