Appellate Court of Illinois· 12/29/2000

People v. Roberts

Citations

743 N.E.2d 1025
252 Ill. Dec. 869
318 Ill. App. 3d 719
2000 Ill. App. LEXIS 1010

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

defendant’s sentencing as a recidivist was not subject to Apprendi rule generally requiring any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt
defendant’s sentencing as a recidivist offender was not subject to Apprendi rule
defendant's sentencing as a recidivist offender was not subject to Apprendi rule
rejecting the defendant’s claim that Apprendi renders recidivist provisions unconstitutional
defendant's sentencing as a recidivist was not subject to Apprendi rule generally requiring any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt
rejected defendant’s assertion that Apprendi renders recidivist provisions unconstitutional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greiman, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.