Appellate Court of Illinois· 11/4/2002

People v. Lundy

Citations

779 N.E.2d 404
334 Ill. App. 3d 819
268 Ill. Dec. 790
2002 Ill. App. LEXIS 1002

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

no ineffectiveness of counsel when no showing is made that had a motion to suppress been litigated, it had a reasonable probability of success
no ineffectiveness of counsel when no showing is made that had a motion to suppress been litigated, it had a reasonable probability of success
where trial court implicitly found officer’s testimony credible in finding the defendant guilty, a motion to quash arrest based on the “unbelievability” of officer’s testimony would have been futile
“the State was required to show, at the very least, that the condition of the narcotics delivered by [the police] matched the description of the narcotics examined by [the lab technician]” (emphasis in original)
section 5 —5—3(c)(8) is constitutional under Apprendi
section 5 — 5—3(c)(8) is constitutional under Apprendi

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cohen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Lundy

25 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.