Appellate Court of Illinois· 12/29/2005

People v. Yancy

Citations

858 N.E.2d 454
306 Ill. Dec. 657
368 Ill. App. 3d 381
2005 Ill. App. LEXIS 1298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “in finding that an enhanced sentence was warranted, the sentencing court was entitled to rely on evidence *** in defendant’s PSI”
holding that “in finding that an enhanced sentence was warranted, the sentencing court was entitled to rely on evidence *** in defendant’s PSI”
fingerprint examiner’s testimony that the quality assurance department agreed with her identification was offered to prove the truth of the matter it asserted, namely, that the department found the prints were defendant’s
“[T]he admission of hearsay *** testimony is harmless error when it is merely cumulative.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
error harmless where there was no evidence to overcome the presumption that the trial judge disregarded hearsay testimony
hearsay fingerprint identification testimony was cumulative of testifying expert’s testimony and did not warrant reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greiman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.