Skip to main content

People v. Garry

Citations

  • 752 N.E.2d 1244
  • 323 Ill. App. 3d 292
  • 257 Ill. Dec. 64
  • 2001 Ill. App. LEXIS 550

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Apprendi does not require a jury determination of facts beyond a reasonable doubt prior to imposing Illinois’ truth-in-sentencing provision limiting amount of good-conduct credit that can be earned to 4.5 days per month
  • holding that Apprendi does not require a jury determination of facts beyond a reasonable doubt prior to imposing Illinois' truth-in-sentencing provision limiting amount of good-conduct credit that can be earned to 4.5 days per month
  • finding that a review of the record reveals that the aggravating factor of bodily harm did not lead to a greater sentence
  • \[T]he finding of great bodily harm simply had an impact upon the amount of time by which defendant-through his own 'good conduct'-could decrease his sentence\ and did not \trigger any penalty for [the] crimes.\ (Emphases omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steigmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.