Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Appellate Court of Illinois· 2/2/2004

People v. Rucker

Citations

  • 803 N.E.2d 31
  • 280 Ill. Dec. 801
  • 346 Ill. App. 3d 873
  • 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 76

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the appellate court had jurisdiction over an appeal despite the pendency of the defendant’s motion only because the motion was not properly before the trial court
  • holding that the appellate court had jurisdiction over an appeal despite the pendency of the defendant's motion only because the motion was not properly before the trial court
  • a court can reasonably assume the parties intended to stipulate the expert opinion had an adequate foundation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.