Arangold Corp. v. Zehnder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reaffirming that the charge at issue in Ali, although labeled a fee, “in reality, was a tax”
• noting that the charges at issue in Boynton and Crocker, although labeled fees, were in fact taxes
• noting that the charges at issue in Boynton and Crocker, although labeled fees, were in fact taxes
• reaffirming that the charge at issue in Ali, although labeled a fee, “in reality, was a tax”
• rejecting argument that uniformity clause prohibits taxing a narrow group to fund a general welfare program
• \The judgments made by the legislature in crafting a statute are not subject to courtroom fact-finding and may be based on rational speculation unsupported by evidence or empirical data\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).