Skip to main content

People v. Jones

Citations

  • 506 N.W.2d 542
  • 201 Mich. App. 449

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • mere assertion that a party’s rights were violated, unaccompanied by record citations or cogent argument, is insufficient to present the issue to this Court
  • “Because defendant has failed to argue the merits of this allegation of error, this issue is not properly presented for review.”
  • a party’s mere assertion that the party’s rights were violated, unaccompanied by record citations, cogent argument, or supporting authority, is insufficient to present an issue for consideration by this Court
  • a party’s mere assertion that the party’s rights were violated, unaccompanied by record citations, cogent argument, or supporting authority, is insufficient to present an issue for consideration by this Court
  • a party’s mere assertion that the party’s rights were violated, unaccompanied by record citations, cogent argument, or supporting authority, is insufficient to present an issue for consideration by this Court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jansen, Cavanagh, Schaefer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.