Skip to main content

People v. Kent

Citations

  • 486 N.W.2d 110
  • 194 Mich. App. 206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the failure to adequately brief an allegation of error precludes appellate review
  • noting that the failure to adequately brief an allegation of error precludes appellate review
  • “It is axiomatic that where a party fails to brief the merits of an -1- I. STANDARD OF REVIEW Defendant’s challenge here is to the sufficiency of the evidence. Under that standard, first adopted by Jackson v Virginia, 443 US 307, 316-317; 99 S Ct 2781; 61 L Ed 2d 560 (1979

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hood, Shepherd, Sanborn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.