People v. Schollaert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s silence was not constitutionally protected because it did not occur during custodial interrogation or in reliance on Miranda rights
• holding that because the defendant’s silence “did not occur during a custodial interrogation situation, []or . . . in reliance on the Miranda warnings,” it had no constitutional protection under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Michigan Constitution
• stating that the parties prior relationship can be considered when determining whether premeditation has been established

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).