People v. Abraham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the obvious implication of [a] remand order” is for the case to “continue in an ordinary manner”
• noting, matters that are implied by the mandate are considered embraced by it
• “in any murder case prior attacks against the murder victim are necessarily nonfatal yet have been held probative of intent”
• \in any murder case prior attacks against the murder victim are necessarily nonfatal yet have been held probative of intent\
• “When a court of review issues a mandate, it vests a trial court with jurisdiction only to take action that conforms with the mandate.”
• “Issues not actually decided by the reviewing court, as well as those not at issue in the appeal, may be considered following remand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).