Skip to main content

People v. Hill

Citations

  • 561 N.W.2d 862
  • 221 Mich. App. 391

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • resentencing required because the trial court failed to prepare separate sentencing information report when imposing consecutive sentences; however, resentencing before a different judge was unnecessary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McDonald, Bandstra, Bosman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.