Michigan Supreme Court· 11/13/1987

People v. Hill

Citations

415 N.W.2d 193
429 Mich. 382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

indicating that Miranda warnings are not required unless the accused is subject to custodial interrogation
indicating that Miranda warnings are not required unless the accused is subject to custodial interrogation
discussing the focus test applied by some panels of this Court to the issue of whether a Miranda warning was required at the time of the search in this case
discussing the focus test applied by some panels of this Court to the issue of whether a Miranda warning was required at the time of the search in this case
“[T]he fact that an individual has become the ‘focus’ of an investigation does not trigger the Miranda requirement.”
“[T]he fact that an individual has become the ‘focus’ of an investigation does not trigger the Miranda requirement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Levin, Cavanagh, Boyle, Archer, Griffin, Brickley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.