People v. McElhaney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a preliminary examination identification was proper where the complainant had ample opportunity to observe her attacker and the preliminary examination took place only two months after the attack
• holding that a preliminary examination identification was proper where the complainant had ample opportunity to observe her attacker and the preliminary examination took place only two months after the attack
• “Under MRE 803(4), the declarant must have the self-interested motivation to speak the truth to treating physicians in order to receive proper medical care, and the statement must be reasonably necessary to the diagnosis and treatment of the patient.”
• defining clearly erroneous standard of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).