Michigan Court of Appeals· 10/7/2003
People v. Coy
Citations
- 669 N.W.2d 831
- 258 Mich. App. 1
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that an objection based on the rules of evidence does not preserve the issue of whether the admission violated a constitutional right
- explaining that due process does not “require that the prosecution seek and find exculpatory evidence”
- indicating that due process does not “require that the prosecution to seek and find exculpatory evidence”
- explaining that due process does not “require that the prosecution seek and find exculpatory evidence”
- stating that to prevail under plain-error review, the error must be “outcome determinative”
- interpreting Michigan Rule of Evidence 103, which covers preservation of objections on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Markey, P.J., and Saad and Wilder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.