People v. Mayhew

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding conduct was not so inflammatory as to prejudice defendant where prosecutor commented in opening statement that the decedent’s wife had lost “both a husband and a friend”
• stating, “the provisions of subsection 6(e) are not applicable here because that subsection only references blood samples and their chemical analysis, without any mention of urine samples or urinalysis.”
• prosecutor who had conflict of interest did not affect prosecution in any way, and, therefore, the defendant suffered no prejudice that would require a new trial
• “[W]e will not reverse the trial court’s decision where it reached the right result for a wrong reason.”
• This Court will not reverse a lower court where it “reached the right result for a wrong reason.”
• “Because no errors were found with regard to any of the above issues, a cumulative effect of errors is incapable of being found.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).