People v. Stone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that delay resulting from defense counsel's withdrawal based upon a conflict of interest was properly excluded from 180-day time period
• holding that delay resulting from defense counsel’s withdrawal based upon a conflict of interest was properly excluded from 180-day time period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Waclawski
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2009-12-29· cited 528×
• People v. Campbell
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2010-07-13· cited 33×
• Grays v. Lafler
  W.D. Michigan· 2008-11-25· cited 19×
• State v. Brown
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2008-07-31· cited 12×
• People v. Humphrey
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2015-09-15· cited 10×
• In re MS
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2011-02-01· cited 7×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Snider
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2000-04-04· cited 323×
• People v. Herndon
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2001-09-06· cited 198×
• People v. Johnson
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2002-07-09· cited 132×
• People v. Webb
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1998-07-21· cited 125×
• State v. Schaaf
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1991-10-16· cited 65×
• People v. Crawford
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1999-02-16· cited 59×
• People v. Coy
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2001-01-10· cited 48×
• People v. Meyers
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1983-03-10· cited 48×
• People v. Malone
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1989-06-06· cited 15×
• People v. Harlan
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1983-10-24· cited 12×
• State v. Rieger
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2005-04-19· cited 4×