Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Michigan Court of Appeals· 2/4/2003

People v. Lueth

Citations

  • 660 N.W.2d 322
  • 253 Mich. App. 670

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that waiver applied where defense counsel expressly approved of the jury instructions after the jury had retired to deliberate
  • holding that defense counsel waived any instructional error when counsel stated, “No, your honor,” in response to the trial court’s question whether there were any objections to the jury instructions as read
  • holding that defense counsel waived any instructional error when counsel stated, “No, your honor,” in response to the trial court’s question whether there were any objections to the jury instructions as read
  • holding that defense counsel waived any instructional error when counsel stated, “No, your honor,” in response to the trial court’s question whether there were any objections to the jury instructions as read
  • stating that if a defendant “expressly approv[es] the instructions, defendant has waived this issue on appeal.”
  • identifying six elements that must be proven to establish a cause of action for embezzlement by an agent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Markey, Cavanagh, Griffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Lueth

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.