People v. Lueth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that waiver applied where defense counsel expressly approved of the jury instructions after the jury had retired to deliberate
• holding that defense counsel waived any instructional error when counsel stated, “No, your honor,” in response to the trial court’s question whether there were any objections to the jury instructions as read
• holding that defense counsel waived any instructional error when counsel stated, “No, your honor,” in response to the trial court’s question whether there were any objections to the jury instructions as read
• holding that defense counsel waived any instructional error when counsel stated, “No, your honor,” in response to the trial court’s question whether there were any objections to the jury instructions as read
• stating that if a defendant “expressly approv[es] the instructions, defendant has waived this issue on appeal.”
• identifying six elements that must be proven to establish a cause of action for embezzlement by an agent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).