Michigan Supreme Court· 7/23/1996

People v. Bender

Citations

551 N.W.2d 71
452 Mich. 594

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

expressing a preference to “approach the law enforcement practices that are at the core of this case in the same manner as the United States Supreme Court approached the constitutional interpretation task in [Miranda]; namely, by announcing a prophylactic rule”
expressing a preference to “approach the law enforcement practices that are at the core of this case in the same manner as the United States Supreme Court approached the constitutional interpretation task in [Miranda]; namely, by announcing a prophylactic rule”
Michigan Constitution requires informing suspect of counsel’s attempts to provide assistance; without such information waiver of rights not knowing and voluntary
defendants’ waivers of right to remain silent and right to counsel were not knowing and intelligent because police did not inform them of attorneys’ attempts to contact them
Michigan constitution requires police to inform suspect that retained attorney is immediately available to consult with him; duty to inform serves as an effective prophylactic rule protecting Michigan's constitutional privilege against self-incrimination and right to counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michael F. Cavanagh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.