People v. Marsack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant[’]s Fifth Amendment rights were not violated by authorities asking the defendant to sign a consent form after he had asked for an attorney
• holding that a defendants Fifth -4- Amendment rights were not violated by authorities asking the defendant to sign a consent form after he had asked for an attorney
• holding that a defendants Fifth -4- Amendment rights were not violated by authorities asking the defendant to sign a consent form after he had asked for an attorney
• explaining that the Fifth Amendment right to counsel is distinct and not necessarily coextensive with the right to counsel afforded criminal defendants under the Sixth Amendment
• “[T]he Fifth Amendment right to counsel is a corollary to the amendment’s stated right against self-incrimination and to due process.”
• “[T]he Fifth Amendment right to counsel is a corollary to the amendment’s stated right against self-incrimination and to due process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).