Patrick Demery v. Extebank Deferred Compensation Plan (B)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plan offered to 15.34% of employees qualified as a top hat plan but stating that “this number [was] probably at or near the upper limit of the acceptable size for a ‘select group’”
• emphasizing that a plan will not lose its top hat status merely because a small number of participants fail to meet one of the criteria
• stating that a “plan’s participants comprising 15.34% of the relevant workforce was sufficiently select
• describing 15.34% of the workforce as within “the acceptable size for a ‘select group’ ”
• comparing the number of employees offered participation in the plan to the size \of an employer's workforce\
• affirming the grant of summary judgment finding a top hat plan when the challengers presented no evidence about the absence of bargaining power

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).