Belka v. Rowe Furniture Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plan covered a select group where 4% of active employees were covered
• holding that a plan covered a select group where 4% of active employees were covered
• participants in valid top hat plan included “salesmén and a diverse group of executives, including vice presidents, sales managers, [and] supervisors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).