NYC C.L.A.S.H., Inc. v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that smoking in a public indoor establishment such as a bar or restaurant does not constitute expressive speech under the First Amendment because a smoker's motivation in that context is generally not to convey a message
• holding that smoking in a public indoor establishment such as a bar or restaurant does not constitute expressive speech under the First Amendment because a smoker's motivation in that context is generally not to convey a message
• setting out the evolution of smoking research and regulation
• “CLASH does not suggest that the gathering of individuals in bars and restaurants to engage in social or even business activities while smoking is the type of ‘intimate’ relationships that the Supreme Court contemplated in Roberts . . . .”
• setting out the evolution of smoking research and regulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).