Paul Sikora v. UPMC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the Plaintiff “has the burden of showing that the Plan is not a top‐hat plan to obtain relief under ERISA”
• estimating that \0.1% of the entire [employer's] workforce was a participant in the Plan.\
• \[Plaintiff] has the burden of showing that the Plan is not a top-hat plan to obtain relief under ERISA\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Marquis Wilson v. United States
  Third Circuit· 2023-08-21· cited 22×
• Browe v. CTC Corp.
  D. Vermont· 2018-06-22· cited 4×
• Donna Browe v. CTC Corp.
  Second Circuit· 2021-09-29

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Skidmore v. Swift & Co.
  Supreme Court· 1944-12-04· cited 4,567×
• Kost v. Kozakiewicz
  Third Circuit· 1993-07-28· cited 630×
• Catherine Willis v. Childrens Hospital of Pittsbur
  Third Circuit· 2015-12-22· cited 445×
• Pane v. RCA Corp.
  Third Circuit· 1989-02-28· cited 144×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1996-07-15· cited 116×
• Patrick Demery v. Extebank Deferred Compensation Plan (B)
  Second Circuit· 2000-06-15· cited 94×
• Duggan v. Hobbs
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-10-29· cited 67×
• Louise Robichaud Samaroo v. Winston R. Samaroo, At&t Management Pension Plan v. Louise M. Robichaud, Louise M. Robichaud.
  Third Circuit· 1999-09-24· cited 45×
• Parker v. NutriSystem, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 2010-09-07· cited 44×
• New Jersey v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
  Third Circuit· 2011-05-18· cited 44×
• Roman-Cancel v. United States
  First Circuit· 2010-07-22· cited 43×
• Rebecca A. Bakri v. Venture Mfg. Company
  Sixth Circuit· 2007-01-17· cited 29×
• Alexander v. Brigham & Women's Physicians Organization, Inc.
  First Circuit· 2008-01-23· cited 25×
• Carrabba v. Randalls Food Markets, Inc.
  N.D. Texas· 1999-02-18· cited 17×