Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 9/3/2003

Parrish v. Sollecito

Citations

  • 280 F. Supp. 2d 145
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15275
  • 92 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1021
  • 2003 WL 22056956

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying motion for new trial, finding evidence was properly excluded to avoid prejudice and confusion
  • reducing punitive damages from $500,000 to $50,000 where the plaintiff suffered a “low degree of actual harm,” the award was 33 times the compensatory damages award, and the court was also awarding attorneys’ fees
  • reducing a fee award by ten percent from the lodestar based in part on the imposition of a punitive damages cap, where “limited recovery of actual damages [entailed] limited success, despite the obviously considerable success entailed in the jury’s punitive damage award”
  • “[A]s this issue has not been resolved by the Second Circuit, such [Eleventh Circuit] precedent is not controlling in this Circuit and this Court is not bound by it.”
  • “A new trial is only warranted where the attorney's concluding argument deprived the opposite party of a fair trial.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • “[O]nly after a verdict is submitted, the trial court must ensure that any award complies with the relevant statutory maximums applicable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marrero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.