Skip to main content
· 2/5/2013

James Trickey v. Kaman Industrial Technologies

Citations

  • 705 F.3d 788
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 2471
  • 117 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 406
  • 2013 WL 425364

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Addressing the third . . . guidepost, this court must also compare damages awarded in similar civil cases.”
  • reducing punitive damages awarded under the Missouri Human Rights Act, which at that time provided that a court \may award to the plaintiff actual and punitive damages\ without any cap
  • upholding a $500,000 punitive damages award and a $100,000 compensatory damages award
  • “We conclude that a 5:1 ratio is within constitutional limits. This is not a case involving a ratio exceeding single digits.”
  • \We conclude that a 5:1 ratio is within constitutional limits. This is not a case involving a ratio exceeding single digits.\
  • considering net worth of defendant- as relevant to the analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Smith, Colloton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.