Miroglio S.P.A. v. Conway Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that vague entries provide a basis for percentage reductions, and collecting cases employing reductions of 15%, 20%, and 50% on that basis
• imposing 15% reduction for block billing and noting that such a reduction was “on the low end of the scale”
• finding entries such as “telephone call to [party],” and “discussion with [party]” to be overly vague
• finding entries such as “letter to [party],” “telephone call to [party],” and “discussion with [party]” to be overly vague
• imposing 15% reduction for block billing and noting that such a reduction was \on the low end of the scale\
• discussing courts’ discretion to award attorneys’ fees and costs under Copyright Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).