Skip to main content
· 7/9/1999

Michael Sarno v. Douglas Elliman-Gibbons & Ives, Inc., Insignia Financial Group, Inc.

Citations

  • 183 F.3d 155
  • 5 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 744
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 15150
  • 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,948

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the same framework applies for analyzing retaliation claims under Title VII and the ADA
  • noting that a claim premised on “lack of notice of the statutory 12-week limitation on FMLA leave” must allege that it impeded or affected plaintiff’s right to reinstatement.
  • explaining that ADA and Title VII retaliation provisions are substantially similar
  • setting forth that the ADA and Title VII retaliation provisions are substantially the same
  • assuming arguendo that “a former employer’s giving an entirely neutral reference to an inquiring prospective employer, leading the prospective employer to decline to hire the applicant, can constitute an adverse employment action”
  • applying the framework for Title VII retaliation claims to ADA retaliation claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Walker, Pooler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.