Tse v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, because plaintiff satisfied the burden of showing reckless indifference in that case, the jury’s “decision to award punitive damages may not be disturbed”
• finding that “[c]ourts in this circuit have often awarded attorneys’ fees to sanction a party who disregards her discovery obligations” and collecting cases
• remitting $3 million punitive damage award to $300,000 where there was very limited evidence of reprehensibility
• finding low degree of reprehensibility where defendant’s actions were not violent or threatening, there was little evidence of malice or deceit, and defendant did not engage in repeated misconduct
• awarding fees and costs incurred in connection with the sanctions motion, and explaining that “[c]ourts in this circuit have often awarded attorney’s fees to sanction a party who disregards [its] discovery obligations”
• awarding fees and costs incurred in connection with the sanctions motion, and explaining that “[c]ourts in this circuit have often awarded attorney’s fees to sanction a party who disregards [its] discovery obligations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).