Owen v. Crosby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that defendants may be procedurally barred from raising claims they could have raised in a previous postconviction motion
• rejecting the defendant's Apprendi claim in light of Ring on the basis of Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So.2d 693 (Fla. 2002
• \[C]laims that could have been raised in a prior postconviction motion are procedurally barred . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).