Skip to main content

Owen v. State

Citations

  • 986 So. 2d 534
  • 2008 WL 1969141

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying cumulative error claim where defendant did not show that any harmful error occurred
  • “Equally available evidence is not suppressed where ‘the defendant was aware of the exculpatory information.’”
  • “Owen argues that trial counsel should have removed juror Knowles .... This argument is without merit .... Next, Owen argues that trial counsel should have removed ... jurors Matousek and Griffin .... This argument is without merit.”
  • “Trial counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to present inadmissible evidence.”
  • “Trial counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to present inadmissible evidence.”
  • “Trial counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to present inadmissible evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

68 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.