Owen Lumber Co. v. Chartrand

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the Kansas Supreme Court has repeatedly held that procedural and remedial statutes “will be given retrospective application only if such retrospective application will not affect a vested right of a party” (quotation and alteration omitted)
• procedural legislative changes generally apply to pending cases unless substantive or vested rights are affected
• involved the claimed right to rely on the current statutory notice requirements in foreclosing a mechanic’s hen
• noting distinction between statute of limitations and statute of repose
• addressing recently enacted statutory requirements predating attachment of mechanic’s lien

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).