Skip to main content

Gillespie v. Seymour

Citations

  • 823 P.2d 782
  • 250 Kan. 123
  • 117 Oil & Gas Rep. 224
  • 1991 Kan. LEXIS 215

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In assessing damages it is within the discretion of the trial court to apply equitable standards in order that the plaintiff may be made whole.”
  • “Our test on appellate review is not whether the [equitable] remedy fashioned is the best remedy that could have been devised, but whether the remedy so fashioned is erroneous as a matter of law or constitutes a breach of trial court discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland, Abbott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

154 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Gillespie v. Seymour

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.