Supreme Court of Kansas· 2/11/2016

Gannon v. State

Citations

303 Kan. 682
368 P.3d 1024
2016 Kan. LEXIS 8

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that generally matters not raised before the district court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
\Interpretation of an appellate court mandate and the determination of whether the district court complied with it on remand are both questions of law subject to de novo review.\
determination of whether district court complied with appellate court mandate is question of law subject to de novo review
\[A]ny other funding system it enacts must be demonstrated to be capable of meeting the equity requirements of Article 6—while not running afoul of the adequacy requirement.\
mandate stayed in order to give the Legislature time to craft a solution
issues not raised before the district court cannot be raised on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beier, David, Johnson, Malone, Michael, Per Curiam, Stegall, Stutzman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.