Supreme Court of Kansas· 8/1/2003
Owen Lumber Co. v. Chartrand
Citations
- 73 P.3d 753
- 276 Kan. 218
- 2003 Kan. LEXIS 480
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting the Kansas Supreme Court has repeatedly held that procedural and remedial statutes “will be given retrospective application only if such retrospective application will not affect a vested right of a party” (quotation and alteration omitted)
- procedural legislative changes generally apply to pending cases unless substantive or vested rights are affected
- involved the claimed right to rely on the current statutory notice requirements in foreclosing a mechanic’s hen
- noting distinction between statute of limitations and statute of repose
- addressing recently enacted statutory requirements predating attachment of mechanic’s lien
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Abbott, Brazil, Gernon, Larson, Luckert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. DupreeSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-04-08· cited 136×
- Robinson v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 2010-10-22· cited 126×
- Owen Lumber Co. v. ChartrandSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-05-04· cited 82×
- Kelly v. VinzantSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-12-12· cited 79×
- Brennan v. Kansas Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-10-21· cited 49×
- Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-12-20· cited 36×
- State ex rel. Secretary of Social & Rehabilitation Services v. BohrerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-08-08· cited 30×
- In Re the Care & Treatment of HuntCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2004-01-23· cited 29×
- Norris v. Kansas Employment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-02-19· cited 27×
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2005-07-15· cited 23×
- Bryant v. MIDWEST STAFF SOLUTIONS, INC.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2011-07-29· cited 22×
- In Re the Adoption of S.J.R.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2006-12-22· cited 15×
- Smith v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-07-18· cited 15×
- State v. BenavidesCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2011-09-23· cited 8×
- Dester v. DesterCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-09-19· cited 8×
- Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace & Bauer, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2009-10-09· cited 7×
- Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2011-02-18· cited 6×
- State v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2005-10-07· cited 6×
- Douglas v. Ad Astra Information Systems, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-08-14· cited 4×
- Rural Water District No. 4 v. City of EudoraD. Kansas· 2012-06-19· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.